Showing posts with label special reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label special reviews. Show all posts

Saturday, June 10, 2023

Video Review: Wendy's Grill Skill

Recently -by which I mean at least 3 years ago- someone leaked a Wendy's training video called Grill Skill to the internet. I worked at Wendy's myself several years ago and I don't remember watching this training video, but then again it was a long time ago. One way or another, I just couldn't let it go without getting made fun of.

Warning: This is going to be long.

Video Links: Part 1 and Part 2.



The video starts with Wendy's founder Dave Thomas standing in a freezer. If all you know about Dave comes from 90's era Wendy's commercials then brace yourself. Because even though this was filmed 13 years before he died they still managed to film it entirely with his reanimated corpse. He seems to be somewhere between bored as hell and suicidal for the entire video.


"Maybe if I stay in this freezer long enough I'll catch pneumonia. Then I won't have to do this stupid video anymore."


It's not polite to mock the dead so I won't go too much into his speech impediment here. Suffice to say that after two minutes of telling us how he has the fray-shest burgers in the bid-ness, he leaves us alone so he can have an old fay-shioned hamburger with mustard, pickle and onions.

We cut to a static shot of a keyhole accompanied by random bird sounds. This scene drags out almost long enough to make you reach for a razor before we finally meet employee Bill. Bill is an idiot.

Anyway, Bill is told to go speak to the manager, Mary, who wants him to learn how to work the grill. Before sitting him down with a training video (yes, the character watches a training video in this training video) she takes the time to remind him that Wendy's only uses 100% pure ground beef, because apparently no one ever explained to the actress that this was a training video and not a commercial.

Anyway, Bill puts the video into the television and this is where everything goes to Hell. The television promptly explodes in a cloud of smoke, which forms into a disembodied spectral head. Because we've already established that Wendy's training videos are made by necromancers this surprises nobody but Bill, not that you'd know he was surprised from the actor's performance. The head introduces itself as the Duke of the Grill (vassal of the Burger King, I'm sure) and drags Bill into the TV and no, I am not making any of this up. It really happens.


"I'm here for your soul. If you're working in food service you won't need it."


Bill finds himself in the home dimension of the Duke of the Grill, who happens to be a dorky black guy in gold-rimmed sunglasses. Sadly for the Duke, his world is nothing but a tiny cage floating in a black void filled with laser lights, his only furniture a single Wendy's grill, and his only food an endless supply of cheese, buns, and talking meat patties.

Maybe if you had some real furniture you wouldn't need to make your meat look pretty, Duke.


What happens next is one of the most painful moments ever recorded to video: a two minute rap about hamburgers. To be fair, the Duke isn't the worst rapper I've ever heard, though that's mostly because Bill tries to rap too. To be unfair, it doesn't matter how good he is, because either way he's still rapping about Wendy's hamburger patties. Snoop Dogg may have been able to name himself after a cartoon character without losing street cred, but even he would look like a jackass doing this rap.

Over the course of the longest two minutes of your life, the Duke explains the proper way to cook a Wendy's burger. The first thing you may notice is he's not wearing any sort of gloves. This is not a mistake. The grill worker doesn't wear gloves for safety reasons. If you accidentally touch the grill or get a grease splatter on your hands then latex gloves will melt and stick to you, turning what would be a mild first-degree burn into a hospital stay. As for cleanliness, well, they're supposed to wash their hands. Personally I always washed my hands before work, but to be totally honest I think I was the only one.

Anyway, on to the actual preparation First you lay it on the grill with the help of an arrow on a piece of paper, because meat has grain (just like wood) and if you lay it down improperly it will turn into deadly poison and murder your dog while it sleeps. Anyway, he then explains about the four corner press. This is where you crush the meat into the grill to spread it out and make it cook faster. As the name implies, you press the meat four times, and you do this twice for a grand total of eight smashes. Usually pressing meat out on a grill like that dries it out, but Wendy's burgers have so much fat in them that even after being smashed out eight times you still have to drain it off, as shown.

Finally the Duke finishes up his rap. Unfortunately, Bill then does the exact same rap again, only with infinity times less enthusiasm. After a gloriously failed attempt at a fist bump, the Duke goes into *shudder* a second verse, this time about how to add cheese to a burger. Defying all logic, this process somehow manages to be longer than one step.

He also mentions that you must never serve burnt, dry, broken, or incomplete patties because "quality is our recipe." But because they use a different recipe for chili, they are allowed to put the burnt, crappy meat into that. That may not sound very appetizing, but to be fair they do shove said meat into a drawer over the grill for several hours before someone finally comes to get it and stick it in the chili pot. Eat up, chili fans!

Finally we cut back to the real world, where Mary snaps Bill out of his smoke-inhalation-induced hallucination by screaming in his ear. As they leave, the camera hangs on the TV way too long in a segment that makes me think the thing is about to transform and eat everyone. Sadly, it doesn't.

Instead we get a montage of Mary teaching Bill the same thing he just learned on the video, then spending the rest of the day watching over his shoulder like a crazy person while taking notes. Clearly after watching the kid stare slack-jawed at a malfunctioning TV for what must have been hours she realized he couldn't be trusted to operate a spatula without close supervision.

Finally, we're back to Dave, who has just received his old fay-shioned hamburger from a girl wearing gigantic nerd glasses. Dave almost bites into his skimpy little burger before realizing what an awful idea that is and putting the horrible greaseball down. He then rephrases the opening speech, this time making sure to assure us that cooking a burger is a very difficult and extraordinary talent that takes lots of practice. You keep telling yourself that, Dave.


"You have to eat it, Dave. The cameras are on you. No, you can't go hang out in the freezer again instead."


We end on a two-minute music video for an awful song called Grill Skill, over which we see clips of hideous people cooking hideous burgers while simultaneously flexing their scrawny muscles, lip synching badly, and playing air guitar with their spatulas.



I actually feel a little bad about making fun of this video, because it's obvious that some poor, misguided person really tried his best on it. That person was the geek who played the Duke of the Grill. As for the other "actors," Bill and Mary's performances are almost good enough to be called phoned in, but the real shining star of half-assedness is Dave Thomas himself whose performance is somewhere between "smoke-signaled" and "100-character tweet without bothering to capitalize the 'I's."

As for the special effects editor (and never before or since has the word "special" been more appropriate), he seems to have tried his best given that a head of cabbage has more brain matter in it than his head.

That's really all there is to say about this video, but there is one last thing I want to leave you with...always remember: Wendy's 100% real ground beef is pattied into squares so the meat hangs off the edge of the bun.

Thursday, November 7, 2019

5 Reasons Cracked Has Always Sucked And You Just Didn't Know It


A note before we begin: I'm not actually sure when I wrote this article. The "Created On" date my computer lists is January 7th, 2016, but I'm pretty sure that's just when I got my new computer and transferred the file over to it. Given the dates of the linked articles, I probably wrote it closer to 2012 or 2013. Point is, it's been a while. In the time since, Cracked has gone absolutely off the rails. First, over half their readership got permabanned... for liking puns. No, seriously. John Cheese wrote a column about how much he hates puns (I guess Cheese doesn't think they're very gouda.) and got so much flak for it that they banned half the site. The writers who were left with brains in their heads instead of smoldering craters of rage decided to jump the rest of the way into the deep end, and now spend their days flailing their arms and shrieking madly about how all men need to die as punishment for the Ghostbusters reboot getting a bad review. So yeah, Cracked is no longer worthy of even a passing glance from any intelligent person. I decided to post this anyway, because I'm an asshole, because I wanted another article to post, and to prove that I was hating Cracked before it was cool, you hipsters.

Way back in 2003 I was inspired by a combination of Seanbaby and the Agony Booth to create my own website, full of all my artwork, role-playing character biographies, and various video game reviews. That site was Knight Productions and it sucked. In 2007 I was inspired again to create a blog with better reviews, less other stuff, and 100% less of Angelfire's bullshit.

While I was not actually inspired by Cracked.com, the website version of the now-defunct Cracked Magazine (aka the poor man's Mad Magazine), it has influenced me quite a bit since then, mostly by showing me that list-based articles are very easy.

Aside from videos, comics, and photoshop contests, the content on Cracked can be fit into two groups: regular articles, which are written by members of the community and pass through the hands of multiple peer reviewers and editors before they hit the front page, and columns, which are written by the site's permanent staff writers and go through absolutely no editing process before being posted.

There are also two types of columnists at Cracked. The first group uses this whole "no editing" thing to awesome effect, being as raunchy or frank as they want without the fear of some editor making mincemeat out of it. The second group uses it as an excuse to take a huge dump all over Cracked's readers once a week.

Guess which group we'll be looking at.



5. 7 Phrases That Are Great Signs It's Time To Stop Talking
By Christina H

On the surface Christina is hard to dislike. She primarily rants about things we all hate: phony people, obnoxious douchebags, the whole works. But then you read the articles and you notice a disturbing trend. She's not talking about specific groups of assholes...she's talking about everyone. Literally everyone is exactly the same to her: a phony, arrogant hipster who needs to get over themselves.

Think you have an interesting and unique personality? Stop pretending you're cool, PHONY. Think you have an interesting story to tell? No one cares but you, ASSHOLE. Think you're talented or skilled in any way? No, you're not, LOSER.

Like a lot of these articles, 7 Phrases That Are Great Signs It's Time To Stop Talking is kind of a misleading title. In this case a more accurate one would be 7 Excuses To Dismiss Legitimate Arguments. In the article Christina discusses 7 "red alert" phrases which she claims instantly let you know the person you're talking to isn't worth your time and can be safely ignored: phrases like "I'm not racist, but..." or "I don't care what anyone thinks of me." If you're not sure what the problem is here, I'm sorry you had to find out this way, but you are everything wrong with the world.

Real intellectuals don't look for petty excuses to ignore dissenting opinions because they know that ignoring dissenting opinions, no matter what your reason, breeds ignorance - of course it does, the word "ignorance" has the word "ignore" right there in it! You can tell a lot about the kind of people who do look for these excuses by looking at the comments to that article. "I hate philosophy." "Anyone who talks about morality outside of church is wasting their life." These are the people who like Christina.

Thing is, I don't believe Christina is stupid. If she was then she wouldn't be writing even semi-philosophical articles like this one. She'd be writing about Ke$ha, or Britney Spears, or about getting drunk and high. No, Christina strikes me more as a person who is at least moderately intelligent, but who is so terrified of being seen as "full of herself" that she's playing dumb in exchange for popularity. There comes a time in every smart person's life when they realize that the world does not want them to be smart, and an unfortunately large number of them will make exactly the same decision that Christina clearly did.



4. The 8 Stupidest Defenses Against Accusations of Sexism
By Luke McKinney

In simple terms this was a follow-up piece to one of Luke's previous articles, The 5 Most Ridiculously Sexist Superhero Costumes, but even saying that is giving this passive-aggressive temper tantrum too much credit. A more accurate name for this one would be "8 Comments On My Last Article That Made Me Totally Cry, You Guys."

Let's get one thing out of the way first: men who write articles about the media's portrayal of women are like white guys who write articles about the N word. I'm not going to say that you're not allowed to be bothered by it. Quite the opposite, in fact. Prejudice and discrimination should still bother you even if they're not directed at you, so sure, a man can absolutely write a post about how women are treated badly... but when it's every single post you make? When you spend hours a day writing article after article about that, and nothing else? People are going to start thinking you're compensating for something.

Besides, objectifying people is literally just what comic books do. Sure, men aren't sexually objectified as often as women, but despite what internet slacktivists tell you, there are other kinds of objectification out there. So yes, the women are the sort of half-naked vixens that prepubescent nerds wish they could get with, and the men are the chiseled slabs of trigger-happy testosterone that prepubescent nerds wish they could be.

Such a stupid premise couldn't possibly have found a better champion than Luke. He established his knack for ignorant bullshit back in 2007's 5 Recent Scientific Advances (And How They'll Destroy Us All). The primary argument in all of his columns is "I don't really know what I'm talking about, but if I remove all context then it doesn't matter." Eventually he moved on to writing social justice articles, presumably because he too realizes he's a moron and knows that now people can't call him out without being accused of hate crimes.

For the sexist costumes article he starts by only bringing up the weakest examples possible, then in a particularly glorious moment of stupidity attempts to prove Wonder Woman's costume is sexist (of course it is, see above) with not one but two pictures of a woman who is not Wonder Woman.

When astute (or at least vaguely awake-ish) readers pointed out that Luke had just made a complete ass of himself again, he responded with The 8 Stupidest Defenses Against Accusations of Sexism, otherwise known as Luke McKinney Calls His Readers Celibate Homos 8 Times, which is especially ridiculous since "call the other person gay" is his number 8 entry. He specifically points out how stupid of a defense that is, then proceeds to use it to defend himself for the rest of the article.

This wasn't the first time a Cracked columnist wrote an article like this, of course. Thing is, the other time was Seanbaby, who has built his comedy career on 1) being an arrogant and dismissive asshole, and 2) being so damn funny and charming that number one doesn't matter. By comparison, Luke is almost as uncharismatic as he is unfunny, and he tries to compensate for that fact by being a hundred times whinier.

Also, no, you don't need to tell me that Seanbaby is an asshole. Since writing this I have developed a much lower amount of respect for him. No, Seanbaby isn't cool, or smart, or even particularly funny. He just acts really confident about what he's saying, which tricks the simpler parts of your brain into thinking that he's making better points than he really is.



3. 5 Unhelpful People You Meet In Every Hospital
By John Cheese

I don't have an actual link to this article, as it seems that everything John Cheese ever wrote for Cracked has since been expunged from the site, presumably because even they realize that he's a total piece and are trying as hard as they can to distance themselves. To be honest, I'd congratulate them on their wise decision, but considering they were perfectly willing to ban half the site for him earlier, I doubt the decision was made for wise reasons. Anyway, I've left the url there just to show that there was a real article at some point, but the link will end up just taking you to Cracked's home page.

If a news story broke tomorrow about a bad crop of strawberries that was giving people food poisoning, Christina H would write an essay on how responding to the story is a sure sign of arrogance and selfishness. Adam Tod Brown would work it into another article on how the outdoors are evil. Luke McKinney would write an article called "5 Reasons Strawberries Hate Black People" and populate it with photos of kiwis. John Cheese would argue that we should all eat the berries anyway because it's not like we could have grown any better ones.

Most of his columns go about the same way: John starts off by ranting about some problem with modern society, then about halfway through he remembers he's a spineless coward and he does an abrubt 180 flip and starts defending the thing instead. If he can't come up with a reasonable defense for it, then he falls back on the easy response of "we're all just too stupid to understand."

It seems there's nothing too terrible for him to defend it, whether it be child abuse, surrendering to bullies, placing money above everything else, or giving up everything you enjoy. So it's a bit hard to choose just one column as being worse than the others.

And again, none of those links are going to work.

In the end, though, I think the title has to go to 5 Unhelpful People You Meet In Every Hospital. Again, to be fair he does at least start out by complaining about a real problem with society, in this case nurses and candy stripers who don't care about their patients, but as usual by the end of it he's rabidly defending their right to murder patients through neglect then casually laugh it off and move right back to gossiping with their co-workers. Unlike some of his other articles people have actually died thanks to the group he's defending, but the real reason this one takes the cake is that his own girlfriend very nearly also died at their hands, which he acknowledges in the article itself.

Yes, even the near-death of a loved one isn't enough to make him actually stand up for anything.



2. New Applicants
By John Cheese

Yep, it's John Cheese again. In this case, not only do I not have a link, I don't even know what the actual title for this one was. All I had written down is what you see above, and as mentioned none of Cheese's articles exist on Cracked anymore. I'm pretty sure the title was something along the lines of "The Biggest Mistakes Made By New Job Applicants" or something.

When Cheese isn't being an apologist he's being a money-grubbing, pompous elitist. Nowhere is this better illustrated then in this article. In the second entry on his list, Cheese tells the story of when he was a manager at an unnamed business. A teenage boy came in to apply and while he was filling out the application his father told the employees that his son played video games too much. Then, when the father and son left Cheese stamped "Do Not Hire" on the application and threw it away.

So, what lesson could an unemployed person looking for a job take from this story? That if your parents like to undermine you then you shouldn't bring them along while job-hunting? About the only lesson we can take from the story is that Cheese is an asshole. The story isn't even remotely related to the point he was trying to make anyway. (The point he was trying to make was about children asking their parents to fill out their applications for them.) Clearly, Cheese was just so proud of himself for stomping on a kid's attempt to get a job that he felt the world must know.



1. Comedians Destroying Hecklers Article
By John Cheese

Surprise! Okay, not really. Given what I've said about John Cheese before, it shouldn't surprise anyone that he's here a third time. Keep in mind, however, all of what I wrote about him came BEFORE he had half the site permabanned to suit his ego, and before whatever meltdown I don't know about that led the rest of the lunatics at Cracked to decide he was too crazy even for them, and finally say "no more Cheese before bedtime." [UPDATE: After actually bothering to look into it, turns out John Cheese was fired because he was literally a rapist. Just goes to show, whenever I call someone an asshole, I'm always right.] Also, there's still no link or title. I'm sure that's a huge disappointment to everyone.

Also, damn it, at least when I'm posting obvious filler because I'm too busy with other things to update properly, it's still things that I actually wrote myself. Where's MY top dollar comedy contract, internet?! Huh? WHERE?!


This article is actually the closest Cheese has ever come to getting anything funny or intelligent on the site, and as with his previous article, "The 9 Most Brilliant Pieces of Comedy Hiding on Youtube", it's entirely because the videos do all of Cheese's work for him. Not that I'm complaining. If this article had been just the videos then it would have been lazy as Hell, yes, but it would also have actually been funny. Cheese's recaps of the videos are so stupid and unfunny that they almost suck all the fun out of watching Bill Burr call a room full of drunks a bunch of assholes. Almost.

Okay, so it's already a lazy and unfunny article, but it's also a prime example of why Cheese sucks. When you actually do read the recaps (because you're a masochist like I am, I guess) you realize that Cheese clearly doesn't understand at all why the videos are funny and satisfying (that is, because they involve smart and witty people defeating stupid jerks), because Cheese prescribes to the Jamie Kennedy method of Human Worth = Money x Fame, and views all the videos in that light (that is, as wealthy and famous people humiliating weak nobodies).

It's obvious the reason Cheese loves these videos so much is because he likes to imagine himself as the comedians in said videos, handily dominating all of his many detractors, while also being so hilarious and insightful about it that even the people he's destroying have to laugh at his jokes and awe at his wisdom. Of course, the irony of the situation is that his amorality and ignorance not only ensure that he will never, ever be able to stomp out his enemies like that, they're also the entire reason why he has said enemies in the first place.

Basically, if he was smart enough to be able to prove all his enemies wrong, then he'd be smart enough to realize that they're actually RIGHT. I like to call this particular phenomenon the Stupid Asshole Paradox.

Friday, April 26, 2019

Better Than Bear! (Survivorman, Alone, Dual Survival)

I talked last time on the blog about Bear Grylls and why he sucks. I've known that he sucks for years now, ever since I watched Man vs. Wild and heard his brilliant survival advice about how wonderful finding a farm was because you could kill and eat all the animals. No, Bear, finding a farm is great because they have a telephone there. If you've found a farm, you're done. You're home, you're saved, survival situation over.

But it's not surprising. Bear Grylls is a spoiled rich boy whose entire existence is a lie. He camps out next to five-star hotels, is "surviving" alongside a full team of camera crew and paramedics, his advice is more likely to get you killed than help you survive, and as I also mentioned he's the type of guy who readily self-identifies as a "philanthropist" which I've found is almost always a sign of an awful person. (What kind of person feels the need to make such a show out of all the good deeds they do? It's basically the same question as "do you tell jokes to see people laugh, or so that people will think you're funny?")

Just to drive the point even further home, below are three other survival TV shows that are much, much, MUCH better than absolutely anything Bear Grylls has ever done, listed here in no particular order.




Not to be confused with Duel Survival, which involves pistols at high noon.

Dual Survival follows a similar premise of the old Man vs. Wild; each episode presents a different survival scenario and tasks the survivalist (or survivalists in this case) with making it out. Where it differs is that every one of the ten guys who has appeared in Dual Survival over the years is, on their own, ten times the survivalist that Bear Grylls is.

The other major difference is that, while the show has had ten separate survivalists over the years, it always has two at a time, hence the name Dual Survival.

First, you have the naturalist. (Originally Cody Lundin, later Matt Graham, and then a bunch of other guys over the last three seasons.) His philosophy is to play it safe. He already knows he can survive for the long haul, so taking risks and burning resources to gain a momentary edge is unnecessary to him; he'll get out when he gets out, and he know how to make it until then.

Second, you have the military survivalist. (Originally Dave Canterbury, then Joseph Teti, and then another bunch of dudes over the last three seasons.) This guy is who Bear Grylls wishes he was - a real military hardass with combat experience. His philosophy is to use whatever tactics you need to, spend your resources, take the risks, get any advantage you can no matter how small, and get out as soon as you can.

Showcasing these two conflicting survival strategies, and forcing them to work together to survive, is the major dynamic of the show, and does make for an interesting experience. There is still a film crew on hand, though, so it's not a real true survival experience. There's also a host of other scandals, including editing to make things look harsher than they are. Even so, at least their advice is generally good and not dumbass crap that will actually get you killed, like Bear's advice.


MEDIOCRE




Nothing says "survival" like Blair Witch stick figures.

The creation of musician and badass survival dude Les Stroud, Survivorman was originally pitched to the networks as Survivor, if Survivor was for real. There's no tribes, no immunity challenges, and no getting voted off. It's just one man all alone in the wilderness. And yes, he is all alone, as it's shown repeatedly that he packs and sets up all of his film equipment himself. There are emergency crews on call, but they're all miles away from him at all times.

Each episode puts Les into a different remote wilderness location, ranging from the dense jungles of Grenada, all the way to the heat of the Kalahari Desert and the frigid forests of northern Ontario, and asks him to make it for one week on his own. He meets with survival experts before each excursion to learn about the terrain, but once he's in country he survives entirely on his own experience and the tools at hand, and absolutely no blueberry pancakes.


GREAT




Nothing says "alone" like two people within shouting distance of each other.

Now take Survivorman, put it one step back towards Survivor by adding in an actual competition element, and you've got Alone. Ten survivalists are each sent out to the wilderness, with several miles of water or mountains separating them. They each have a camera, ten items they've selected for their survival kit, and a satellite phone which they can use to "tap out" by calling for an immediate evac. The last man still in the wild after all others have tapped out (or been forced out due to medical emergency) takes home $500,000.

While there are always a few who fail right away (half of the first season's contestants tap out within the first week) most of them make it for the long haul, easily lasting for months. The point is, they do know what they're doing, and they're not even professional adventurers who spent three years training with the SAS Reserves like Bear is!

All kidding aside, the show is pretty engaging. Of the five seasons produced so far, three of them take place in the beautiful North American rainforest of Vancouver Island, specifically around Quatsino Sound. Seasons three and five switch it up, sending contestants to Patagonia, Argentina, and to Khonin Nuga, Mongolia, respectively. The sixth season is set to premier in June of this year, and will task competitors with surviving in the Arctic.


GREAT

Thursday, February 28, 2019

A Bubsy Mega Review!


Back in the 1990's we were all about the extreme, so much so that even the word "extreme" wasn't extreme enough for us. We went in for the upgraded, new and improved XTREEM. Similarly, when we made video games starring animal mascots with attitude, the word "attitude" was ironically not sufficient to convey just how much attitude our animal mascots had. No, they didn't have attitude. They had 'TUDE. And it was XTREEM.

Of all the animal mascots with 'tude, none had more 'tude than Bubsy the Bobcat. Accolade really tried hard to make Bubsy the next big thing. It never quite worked. Still, at the risk of losing my internet writer's license (and with the guarantee of repeating a joke I already used when I reviewed Wild Wild West) I have to admit that I never hated Bubsy. Maybe that's because I wasn't a hardcore enough gamer at the time to be sick of the genre. Maybe it's because I only played two of the games. Who knows?

In the interest of fairness, science, and relieving my own boredom I decided to play all four games in the Bubsy series and give my honest opinion on them. What could paw-sibbly go wrong?

(Note: I am aware that there are actually five Bubsy games out now, with a sixth coming this spring. I originally wrote this review something like three years ago but due to life circumstances I never got around to finishing it. At that time Woolies Strike Back had not yet even been announced. I considered holding off on this review until after I played the most recent game in the series... but I'm too broke for that and I'm not sure I care anyway. Instead, I just decided to post this review mostly as it was. I get a blog post out of it, and you get to watch my "salty" level steadily increase from "almost none" to "enough to cause total kidney failure." Everybody wins!)



Bubsy in Claws Encounters of the Furred Kind
Let me start out by saying that I don't find puns nearly as offensive as a lot of people do. In fact, I love puns. I annoy all of my friends with them, and Piers Anthony's Xanth series remains a favorite of mine to this day. That should give you an idea of how I feel about puns, and this game's title should give you an idea of how punny it likes to be.

The one good thing I will say for Bubsy is that he was a character with personality. Well, sort of. More on that later. Even compared to other animal mascots like Sonic the Hedgehog, Bubsy's animations are all notably very expressive. They even gave him a diverse variety of cartoony death animations for whenever you get killed in the game, which was a nice touch.

Hell, Bubsy was one of the first video game characters to actually talk to you. (Though not THE first, the first video game with voice clips was 1980's Berzerk.) He had a sound bite of dialog before every level, though that did turn into a bit of a downside because there's only one dialog bite per level and you have to listen to it every time you die.

And oh yes, you WILL die.

If you've ever read or watched a video about Bubsy then you should already know that it is a hard game. To be completely fair, it's not nearly as hard as internet people like to pretend it is. Yes, there is fall damage, but as long as you remember you have a glide button that cancels all fall damage, you should never die from it. Yes, Bubsy is a one-hit-point wonder, but enemies and traps are generally easy enough to avoid if you take it slow.

That said, don't get me wrong. It is a hard game, and not all of that is legitimate. Alright, I'll admit it: very little of that is legitimate. The controls are wonky, you slide around a lot and if you build up too much momentum Bubsy can become nearly impossible to control. Your field of vision is too small, so you can't tell what's coming up ahead. Enemy hitboxes are off and I got hit a lot at times when I could swear I never touched an enemy. This isn't helped by the fact that, as mentioned, one hit from anything will kill you instantly.

The game also has a lot of cheap shots and blind jumps. For example, when you see this pipe, do you go down it?


Look at that smug face. He knows you're about to lose a life and he takes pleasure in it.

The answer is no, it kills you. However, not all pipes are lethal. Some of them have power-ups and yarn balls in them. So how do you know which is which? You can't. You just have to guess. To be fair, you do have 9 lives (because he's a cat, get it?) and you can get more by collecting one-up t-shirts. To be unfair, you can burn through all your lives pretty fast. It's almost like the developers were so proud of the death animations they made that they wanted to make sure you'd see them as much as possible.

Overall, Bubsy is not nearly the unmitigated train wreck you've probably heard it is. I respect the ambition that went into it and I do like a lot of the ideas they had. The game is quirky, the main character was very expressive, and I liked the idea of having multiple paths through each level. Still, the controls are just way too wonky and the game takes too many cheap shots at you.

It probably won't surprise you at all to learn the lead designer had never created a game like this before. Prior to Bubsy, his only projects had been text-based adventures, and Accolade even refused to invest in this game until he first played through Sonic the Hedgehog and wrote them an essay on why he thought it was successful. No, I'm not joking. I guess it is cool that the designer went outside his comfort zone and tried his hand at something new... just a shame this game is what he ended up with.

Looking back, I think the main reason I didn't mind the game as a kid is because I sucked at games. Every game I played back then felt super difficult to me and I used cheat codes to get through them all anyway, so I didn't notice how much BS this game was.


KR Rating: BAD



Bubsy in Fractured Furry Tales
Although this was the second Bubsy game I played for this review, it wasn't actually the second Bubsy, that was the creatively titled Bubsy II. This was actually the third Bubsy, though it wasn't the official third Bubsy. That "honor" belongs to the notorious Bubsy 3D.

This game was more like Bubsy 2.5. After his first two games, Bubsy made his first foray into another system, on the Atari Jaguar. I never played this game as a kid, due mostly to not owning a Jaguar. It was actually the game I looked forward to playing the most for this review. Part of this was the hope that the fairy tale angle would give them some more interesting ideas for levels and enemies to work with.

On this one point, at least, the game didn't disappoint. I'm reminded of a story about how Steven Spielberg chose to make Temple of Doom as a prequel because he didn't want Indiana Jones to be defined by his fighting Nazis. That's this game, in a nutshell. It is certainly refreshing to see Bubsy get to fight something other than woolies, woolies, and oh hey look it's more woolies.


I'm not sure what mohawk flamingos have to do with Alice in Wonderland, though.

The other reason I looked forward to this game was the hope that being on a more powerful system would allow them to fix a lot of the game's problems. IT DID NOT. The graphics are... okay, I guess. The sound is just as bad as it always was, and the voices are even worse now because the sound bite now changes with every world instead of every level, meaning there's even more repetition.

The controls... they actually seem to have gotten worse. There's still the weird, floaty jumps and the momentum issues, but where starting up used to be quick it now feels like Bubsy is running on fly paper.

Worst of all, the ability to figure out different paths through the level is also gone. The levels are still big, but now you actually need to go through every nook and cranny in order to open up the way forward. It makes every level last way too long and turns the game into a slog.

The first game could be fun once you got past its problems, but this game has nothing going for it.

Also, I feel like they wasted the potential for a good pun by not calling it "Fractured Furry Tails." That alone is enough to earn it a rating of...


KR Rating: HORRIBLE



Bubsy II
The big problem with the "animal mascots with 'tude" genre is that they tended to rely too much on the wackiness of their premise and the charisma of their characters, and so gameplay tended to suffer. The most successful of these games were the ones that managed to find a happy balance, like Ratchet and Clank and Spyro the Dragon.

Comparatively, Bubsy's gameplay is barely passable at best, its premise isn't really all that wacky, and as much as I respect the expressiveness in Bubsy's sprites, the character has basically zero charisma.

The point I'm making here is that Bubsy was always bad, but at least the first game was trying. This game? Not even a little. There's even a story going around about the lead designer from the first game visiting the studio during this game's development and seeing Bubsy dolls hanging from the ceiling by shoestring nooses. That's how much the developers of Bubsy II cared about making a good game. They couldn't even be bothered to give it a wacky pun title. For shame.

All I have to say about this game is that it sucks. The gameplay sucks, Bubsy sucks, and his obnoxious nephew and niece, added in this game, are two of the worst characters ever made.


KR Rating: SHOVEL



Bubsy 3D in Furbitten Planet
Along with the first game in the series, this is the second of the two Bubsy games that I actually played as a child. It's also hands down the worst one they made, and the only one of the four games that I refused to play again for this review. "But what about journalistic integrity?" That went into the same meat grinder that I'd rather shove my face in than play this game again. Look, I'll still defend Claws Encounters of the Furred Kind to a certain extent, but not this game. Never this game. Claws Uncounters might be "Love It or Hate It" but this game? This game is just "Hate It or Hate It." Anyone who claims to enjoy this game is either trying to be ironic, or is a drooling imbecile.

I guess I do need to talk about this game just a little bit... Bubsy 3D came out in the wake of Super Mario 64, when every 2D platformer had to become 3D. Sometimes it worked out really well, like with Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, which led to a reinvention of that entire franchise. Other times it merely turned out "okay" like with all the 3D Castlevania games.

Bubsy 3D does not fall into either of those categories. This game is a total mess. Just look at this crap, and remember this came out a half a year AFTER Super Mario 64.


Above: Bubsy 3D. Below: A real game.

Not shown - the terrible camera, unusable tank controls, or the gas oven it will make you want to stick your head in. It's no surprise this game finally killed off the franchise for good. (At least until 2017.)


KR Rating: SHOVEL



Bubsy, the Cartoon
At last we come to the last piece of Bubsy out there. (Aside from the other two games which, as mentioned, were not out when I wrote this review.) Well, sort of. Technically there never was a Bubsy cartoon. There was a pilot, but no network was ever stupid enough to pick it up.

The biggest problem with the Bubsy cartoon is that IT NEVER SHUTS UP. Other reviewers have already pointed out how the show fills every solitary second with sound. Personally, I feel like they're selling it short. Bubsy somehow managed to fit an entire hour worth of dialog into 22 minutes of show. By the end of it all I just felt worn out.

I couldn't even bring myself to feel upset about how they milked Arnold the Armadillo's fear of getting run over by a truck for comedy. Normally I hate the Butt Monkey trope and this show's use of it is almost as bad as Meg from Family Guy, but in the end I was just too tired to be annoyed. That's how bad it is.

The worst part is, none of it even matters, even by the standards of kids' shows from the 90's.

The plot makes no sense, revolving around a "virtual reality" helmet that somehow makes things real for people who aren't even wearing it. It's basically a wish-granting genie in stupid hat form.

The writing is atrocious. Despite all the dialog they crammed into this thing, there's actually only like 5 jokes in it, each repeated ad nauseum despite not being funny the first time. The writing is definitely going for a "quantity over quality" approach. Three guesses as to whether you think it works, and the first two guesses don't count.

Oh, and the characters.... GAH! The characters! I mentioned before that Bubsy only "sort of" had personality... this is where I first realized this: Bubsy doesn't have personality, he has attitude, and there's a difference. See, I know how Bubsy acts. I've seen his expressions. I've heard his insipid catchphrase and his stupid lisp. ...but I don't know who he is. What does he believe in? How does he feel about stuff? What are his goals? No one knows.

It's the same for all of these characters. Every single one of them can be summed up in a single sentence or even a single word. They barely qualify as characters. They're just platforms for one of the five terrible jokes.

Well, at least it's still not Bubsy 3D.


KR Rating: THE CRAP GLASS IS HALF FULL

Monday, December 31, 2018

The Top 5 Lamest Bits From Super Smash Stadium

I've talked very briefly before about Super Smash Stadium, hands down the best massive Super Smash Bros fanfiction out there.

Okay, so I may be a bit biased since I was a part of it, but it was the first of its kind and the biggest, and while it was rather awkward early on, but I personally like to think that it eventually transcended the genre and became more than a mere fanfic but actually a great creation in its own right.

Even so, I will admit is that it was never perfect. Following are the five lowest points in Super Smash Stadium's history.

(I should note, however, that I will not be counting anything from after Metal Man took over the site, meaning nothing from Season X1 or X2. This is specifically about the site's original run. If I was going to include Metal's contributions, it would be as "absolutely everything involving Metal Man.")

5. Ash Ketchum
"But wait," I hear you say. "Ash Ketchum being in Super Smash Bros would be stupid, sure, but how is it one of the worst things ever?" Well, what if I told you that he didn't have any of his pokémon with him, not even Pikachu? What if I went on to tell you that he was a clone of SSB fighter Ness, who mastered all of Ness's psychic techniques after a single training session? And what if I also told you that, in order to differentiate his moves from Ness's he screamed the obnoxious pun "PokéThunder" instead of PK Thunder? And what if I now ask you to please put down the knife because murdering the author wouldn't be worth it?

Maybe a little explanation would help. Early on all SSS matches were created by having the characters fight in the actual Super Smash Bros game and writing down what happened, and so any original characters had to be clones of existing characters in order to facilitate that. This was also before Pokémon Trainer was an official character, so we couldn't just clone him.

Why make him a clone of Ness, specifically? Why not just let him be in the Stadium as a non-fighter, being the trainer for Pikachu? Why use that godawful PokéThunder pun? Only the original author - Lemmy Koopa - knows for sure.

The writers work in mysterious and often stupid ways.

4. Yoshelly
If anything about SSS spoke to the "teenage kid's fanfic" stereotype then Yoshelly, a superfluous pink Yoshi described in her first appearance as "the most famous Yoshi at Dinosaur High School", was that thing.

Yoshelly was born from a strange combination of feminism and misogyny. On the one hand, the stated reason for her creation as a character was a perceived lack of female characters in Super Smash Brothers. (This was in the time of the first game, when the only definite confirmed girl was Samus Aran, though we were also operating under the idea of Jigglypuff being a girl.)

But on the other hand her first appearance involved her being given away as a love slave to the winner of Match 8, so yeah.

Yoshelly never had much in the way of personality, power, or impact on the plot and, like most of the other characters on this list, she was thankfully done away with by Lord Reid during the Comic Match in season 3.

3. Kirbetty
Kirbetty, like Yoshelly, was supposedly created because of a perceived lack of female fighters, and like Yoshelly she was a poorly considered mistake who was thankfully ended in the season 3 Comic Match.

Also like Yoshelly, Kirbetty was introduced to act as an existing character's girlfriend, in this case Kirby's. What makes Kirbetty worse by far is that, unlike Yoshelly, Kirbetty actually replaced an existing character. The storyline already had a girlfriend for Kirby in Jigglypuff, and when Kirbetty joined it was as part of the "cat fight" that forced Jigglypuff to leave the Stadium until the very end of season 1.

2. The Rex Storyline
This was an attempt at an "interactive story" connecting the website with the message boards. The villain of the story, Rex (or as he was known on the boards "!REX Airship!") was going to appear on the message boards for a bit to mess with the fans, before getting defeated by all the heroes of the Stadium. I know, it sounds fun and it possibly could have been.

But then they let Lord Reid play the part of Rex.

While we all thank Reid for ridding the Stadium of Ash, Yoshelly, and Kirbetty, that doesn't change the fact that he was also very sadistic, selfish, and generally kind of an asshole. Rather than lighthearted riffing and playing with the fans, he tormented people, pretending that an insane hacker had taken over the site and was going to destroy it forever. This was especially bad considering all of this happened only a couple of months after a real hacker actually did take over the message boards.

The Rex storyline was by far the lowest point for SSS. A large chunk of the fanbase ran away from fear or stress, and even more left out of disgust after Rex's true identity was revealed. The only reason the Rex storyline isn't number 1 is because, while it was highly damaging to the fanbase, it wasn't so much for the site itself and a newcomer to the site now wouldn't even know very much had happened. The same can not be said for...

1. Ganna Legacy
Ganna Legacy was a story written by SSS's then-president, VGW. It was sort of a fanfic, in that it included a small handful of characters from Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, but it was mostly it's own thing. I know you're probably asking, "so what's the problem?" The guy is allowed to write more than one thing. Unfortunately, VGW disagreed with the previous sentence.

Even though the stories had dick all to do with each other, VGW decided that they must be one, and that SSS was the one that was going to have to change to accomodate the new material. Ganna Legacy became required reading to understand the plot of season 2, which was really bad for two reasons.

First, Ganna Legacy sucked. It was boring and mostly existed as an ego wank for VGW's Marty Stu self-insert character, Dark Horse.

Second, the story was never actually finished and then what little there was got lost in a server crash, officially rendering the entirety of season 2 incomprehensible.

But wait, Ganna's legacy of shame doesn't end there! When VGW stepped down at the end of season 2, he was replaced by Zeratul, who proceeded to overreact to the whole debacle on a level somewhere between "anime villain" and "political pundit." Reasoning that season 2's problems lay with the fact that it had a story (as opposed to this particular story simply being bad and poorly executed) Zer banned the entire concept of story from the site for season 3. He immediately terminated any and all attempts at ongoing story arcs, character development, and even running gags. In the end, the rest of us were left to come up with a story for the season 3 finale at the last minute, after Zer dropped off the edge of the Earth.

So basically, Ganna Legacy was responsible for ruining two entire seasons of the site. That's why it remains the lamest part of the entire Stadium.